Your marketing team has a task board. What it does not have is portfolio control.

Completix gives marketing leaders the layer above the work: what got approved and why, who is actually available, where the annual budget stands, and what leadership sees at quarter close.

Built for in house marketing teams and agencies running many concurrent campaigns against one shared pool of people and one annual number.

A request queue is not a plan. A scored intake is.

Marketing absorbs demand from every part of the business, and most of it arrives informally. The cost is not the extra work, it is that the team cannot show why one thing was chosen over another when the year is reviewed.

• One intake form for every requester, so the same information is captured whether the request comes from sales, product or a regional team.
• Scoring criteria you define, applied consistently, so the ranking is a position you can defend rather than an opinion.
• Approval is a human review governed by your policy. Completix records who decided, when, and on what basis. It does not decide for you.
• Approved requests become campaigns in the portfolio with a budget and an owner, so nothing starts without a place to track it.

The constraint is never the campaign. It is the four people every campaign needs.

Marketing runs many small efforts at once against one designer, one developer and one media buyer. Board tools show each campaign's tasks in isolation, which is precisely why the collision is invisible until a date is already at risk.

• Allocation is tracked per individual, not by role type, so the answer is about Priya specifically rather than about designers in general.
• One view spans every active campaign, so you can see the total commitment on a person before you approve the next request.
• Agency and contractor time sits in the same picture as internal staff, so a capacity decision is not split across two systems.
• Overallocation gives you a defensible reason to defer, which is the only thing that makes a no stick with a stakeholder.

Where the money went, at the level someone will actually ask about it

Marketing budgets fail in the detail, not the total. Media overruns while production underspends, the agency retainer covers less than expected, and the net looks fine until the category breakdown is requested.

• Each campaign holds approved budget, forecast, actuals and estimate at completion, broken down by the cost lines you define.
• Agency and vendor costs are tracked as their own lines against the campaign, so the retainer position is visible next to media and production.
• Forecasts are revised deliberately by a named person, and the change is recorded. Nothing is quietly adjusted underneath you.
• Campaign positions roll up to the annual marketing number, so the portfolio view and the campaign view never disagree.