Completix is project portfolio management software built for IT and software organizations. IT portfolios do not fail at the code. They fail at the point where more work is committed than the team can absorb, and nobody has the evidence to say so in the room where the decision gets made.
| Request | Requested by | Type | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Replacement Program | Sales Operations | Business system | 87 | Approved |
| Data Center Exit, Phase 2 | Infrastructure | Migration | 74 | In review |
| SSO and MFA Rollout | Information Security | Security | 71 | In review |
| Partner API v2 | Product | Software | 66 | Queued |
| Warehouse Reporting Refresh | Finance | Analytics | 52 | Queued |
The IT portfolio is a pipeline, not a list. Completix holds every stage of that pipeline in one place, so the trade-off you made in March is still visible in September.
Requests arrive through one demand and intake management form with the fields you need, not five inboxes and a spreadsheet.
Score demand against your own criteria and rank it with portfolio prioritization, so the board argues about the ranking, not the data.
Approve against real capacity and a real project budget, with the people you are spending named individually.
Each team keeps its own method. Schedules, RAID logs, and expenses roll up the same way regardless.
Stage gates are reviews. Approval is routed by your policy and given by named people, never by the system.
Status is live in the platform. Posting a period freezes that view as a snapshot nobody can rewrite later.
Whether you run a central IT PMO, a product engineering group, an infrastructure function, or a client delivery business, the tooling and vocabulary change but the underlying problem does not. Too much demand, too few of the right people, and no single place where the trade-offs are recorded.
Portfolio governance, intake prioritization, and executive reporting across a large concurrent project portfolio.
Multi-team delivery coordination, release planning, and the link between sprint level work and portfolio level funding.
Cloud migrations, data center exits, and platform rollouts where third parties hold critical path work.
Client delivery across many concurrent engagements, where utilization and commitments decide the margin.
Multi-year, multi-workstream programs with an executive sponsor who wants a straight answer every month.
Remediation and control work that has to be evidenced later, often to somebody outside the organization.
In IT the constraint is rarely money, it is four or five named specialists that every program depends on. Completix tracks resource allocation per individual person, not per role type, so a conflict shows up while you can still do something about it.
| Person | Role | Aug | Sep | Oct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Whitfield | Solution Architect | 100% | 135% | 120% |
| P. Nadeau | Lead Developer | 90% | 95% | 70% |
| S. Iqbal | Integration Engineer | 60% | 85% | 90% |
| M. Okonjo | Data Engineer | 45% | 55% | 80% |
| R. Lindqvist | Business Analyst | 75% | 65% | 50% |
Completix is methodology agnostic. Governance sits above delivery, so a sprint team and an infrastructure program can report into the same portfolio without either one changing how it works.
Choose the methodology and stage structure that fits each piece of work. The portfolio does not force one shape onto every team.
A gate is a review with approval routed by your policy and given by named people. Nothing is approved by the system, and funding decisions are made at the gate, by humans.
Schedule, budget, RAID, and status roll up consistently whatever the delivery method underneath, so the portfolio view compares like with like.
On integrations: Completix supports custom integrations with the systems you already run. Scope is assessed during discovery and delivered as part of a services engagement, rather than assumed to work out of a connector list.
Approved, forecast, and estimate at completion sit on the same card, with actuals posted against them. When forecast pulls away from approved, you can see it in the month it happens instead of in the year end review.
Status reporting in Completix is live and current, assembled from the project itself rather than typed into a deck. When a reporting period closes, posting it creates a snapshot of exactly what was true that week, and that snapshot does not change afterwards.
Data migration testing is running two weeks behind the baseline after a second extract cycle was added. Forecast now exceeds approved budget by 82,000, driven by additional integration effort. A change request covering the extra scope is with the sponsor for review.
Every project carries the same working parts, so nothing lives in a side spreadsheet that only one person maintains.
Task structure, dependencies, and baselines for teams that plan that way, alongside teams that do not.
Risks, actions, issues, and decisions, each as its own log, every entry owned and dated.
Variance across the portfolio surfaced in one view. It tells you where to look, you decide what to do.
Quotes and invoices held against the project, with the difference between them visible before you approve.
Architecture decisions, contracts, and sign offs attached to the project they belong to.
Portfolio health, spend, and delivery position in one screen for the people who only get ten minutes.
The platform is the same. What changes is the pressure each portfolio is under, and which parts of it you lean on most.
Multi-year programs tracked against contract gates and audit trails.
Procurement defensibility and a decision record that survives review.
Regulatory change portfolios with evidenced governance.
Capital projects competing for the same constrained engineering pool.
Design and delivery phases with schedule and cost held together.
Billable delivery across client accounts with utilization in view.
Grant funded work and term cycles planned against real capacity.
Campaign portfolios with shared creative resources and fixed dates.
The questions IT and software buyers ask most often before booking time with us. If yours is not here, ask it directly and we will answer it in writing.
Ask a questionIT project management software gives an IT organization one place to record incoming demand, decide what to fund, plan the people who will do the work, and report on delivery. Completix goes a step further into project portfolio management, connecting strategy, prioritization, funding, governance, and delivery rather than tracking tasks alone.
Yes. Completix is methodology agnostic. Sprint based teams, traditional waterfall projects, and hybrid delivery all sit inside the same portfolio, and each project uses the methodology and stage structure that suits it. Governance and reporting sit above delivery, so leadership gets one consistent view regardless of how each team chooses to execute.
Resource allocation is visible at project and portfolio level, tracked against named individuals rather than role types. You can see who is committed to what, at what percentage, across all active work, and overallocation is visible before a new commitment is approved. That capacity picture is available at the point you review incoming demand.
A gate is a review, not an automated checkpoint. Approval is routed according to your governance policy and given by named people, and the decision is recorded with its rationale. Funding decisions are made at the gate by the people accountable for them. Nothing is approved, escalated, or released by the system on its own.
Yes. Each project carries approved budget, forecast, estimate at completion, and variance, with actuals posted against them. Vendor quotes and invoices are recorded on the project and the difference between them is visible at the point of review. Costs count toward the budget when you post them, so actuals only move on a deliberate action.
Risks, actions, issues, and decisions are held as four separate logs inside the project and viewed one at a time. Every entry has an owner and a status, and decisions carry the approver and the reasoning behind them. The RAID log lives in the project itself, so architecture calls and change approvals are not lost in meeting notes.
Completix supports custom integrations with the systems you already run. Integration scope is assessed during discovery and delivered as part of a services engagement by the product team, rather than assumed to work from a standard connector list. Microsoft Project plans can be imported and exported as MPP files.
Yes, that is the primary use case. Portfolio health, resource position, budget position, and strategic alignment are visible without asking project managers to compile weekly reports in different formats, and intake management gives the PMO a structured way to evaluate and rank demand before commitments are made. See the PMO overview for how the pieces fit together.
Most teams are working in the platform within days of starting onboarding, because Completix is delivered directly by the product team rather than through a reseller or system integrator. Larger deployments involving single sign on or custom integrations are scoped during discovery and measured in weeks rather than quarters.
Written for people building a shortlist, not for people who have already decided.
Five platforms reviewed side by side, with what each one is genuinely good at and where it gets expensive or heavy.
Read the comparison GuideHow project, program, and portfolio management fit together, and what software should actually do at each level.
Read the guide AnalysisWhere the main PPM platforms sit against each other on capability and implementation weight.
Read the analysisBring a live program and a week of real demand. We will walk through intake, capacity, and the portfolio view with your numbers rather than a sample dataset.
Deployed directly by Completix, with no system integrator required.